Don’t Be Fooled By E-911 Language
The major U.S. wireless carriers are
fast at work installing their 4G LTE upgrades and modernizing their
networks to improve the speed and capacity. This is a massive
project requiring carriers to touch all or most of their cell sites.
Across the country, consultants hired by the carriers are contacting
cell site landlords with Letters of Authorization, Letters of Consent
or proposed amendments. Landlords should be sure to check their
leases before signing any documents received from the carrier
consultants. Often these documents are presented as “standard”
and no reference to the specific types of modifications or their
impact on the subject property are explained. Depending on your
lease terms, some of the terms may be negotiable and/or an amendment
may be required.
Recently, our clients have requested
that we review many such amendments. What we are finding is that the
carrier amendments many times include terms that are not tied
directly to the modification, but go further to modify the lease
terms more favorably for the carrier. For example, AT&T
amendments we have seen include a provision entitled, “Emergency
911 Service”. At first glance, it seems neighborly to allow AT&T
to make emergency 911 modifications to its cell site that are
mandated by the government. However, a more careful reading reveals
that the language proposed by AT&T is much more broad than
strictly emergency services. AT&T’s language provides in part
that, for no additional rent, the Landlord agrees that AT&T “may
add, modify and/or replace equipment in order to be in compliance
with any current or future federal, state or local mandated
application, including but not limited to emergency 911 communication
services”. Note some of the key words, “including but not
limited to.” This language is not precise and is therefore open to
interpretation. One could interpret AT&T’s language such that
AT&T’s addition of a generator to the subject cell site is
permitted, especially if it is part of an E-911 mandate. However,
bringing a generator to a property can have substantial implications,
including added land owner liability. What if there is a gas or
diesel spill? Will the generator make noise? What if the generator
emits strong odors? Where will the generator be placed? Will
additional space be required beyond the lease area? Will the
Landlord be obligated to yield such space without additional rent?
Another term Landlords may want to
consider when reviewing AT&T amendments is whether the Landlord
wants to require AT&T to remove the Memorandum of Lease from the
title record of the subject property upon expiration or earlier
termination of the AT&T lease. AT&T’s amendments often
seek to permit “either party” the right to record a new
Memorandum of Lease. While some property owners refuse to let such
Memorandums be recorded on their property, another solution is to
require carriers, such as AT&T, to cause the Memorandum of Lease
to be released from the property via a quit claim instrument or as
otherwise may be requested by the local recorder’s office. Such
release should occur within a set time period after the expiration or
termination of the lease. If the carrier does not remove the
Memorandum during such time period, the Landlord should include the
right to act as a power of attorney on behalf of the carrier, at
carrier’s sole expense, to cause the Memorandum to be released from
title.
Finally, pay close attention to when
the increased monthly rent commences. In recent AT&T amendments,
we have seen that rent commences when AT&T commences installation
of its equipment, however, if AT&T is leasing additional space,
then rent should commence when the amendment is effective (typically
full execution). If you, as the landlord, are keeping space for
AT&T’s use, but AT&T does not install its equipment for
more than a year, you have kept the space for AT&T’s use
without compensation for that year. Essentially, such language
serves as a free option for AT&T to preserve space for its future
modifications.
All of the carriers have their own
template amendments so be sure to read through the “standard”
templates carefully. Remember, the carriers have their own attorneys
looking out for their interests so you must be mindful to watch out
for your own interests. If you would like us to review your lease to
see if an amendment is required for the carrier’s proposed
modification or review an amendment on your behalf and ensure you are
adequately protected, please do not hesitate to contact us for more
information.
Please note that “AT&T” is a
registered trademark owned by AT&T Intellectual Property and/or
AT&T affiliated companies. Cell Tower Attorney is not affiliated
with AT&T in any way and the blog post above is offered strictly
as an opinion. If you wish to learn more about AT&T, please go
to www.att.com.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home